30 Days Of Night (David Slade, 2007)

Posted in Film on September 4, 2010 by culturecrammer

That rare beast, a vampire film you can get your teeth into

The recent glut of vampire movies is probably enough to sate even the most ardent fang-flick fancier, but 2007′s 30 Days Of Night is one you may have missed.  Based on the cult comic book of the same name, it’s a proper grown-up horror film – an exercise in bleak, existential terror.

Once a year in the remote snowbound town of Barrow, Alaska, the sun sets and does not come up again for an entire month. A pack of vampires discover this ideal hunting ground and, as the light dwindles, they descend on the town for a feeding frenzy.  Josh Hartnett plays the local sheriff trying to keep a handful of survivors alive long enough to see the dawn.

The plot may not be original, but in the hands of Hard Candy director David Slade and with Sam Raimi on production duties, the film’s execution is a cut above. Stark, minimal and strikingly shot, its relentless air of grim isolation harks back to John Carpenter’s 1982 masterpiece The Thing.  It features some brilliant set pieces and camerawork, including a stunning prolonged aerial shot as the vampires first lay waste to the town.

The bloodsuckers themselves are superbly realised.  These are old-school Nosferatu – ancient, feral and demonic, their black eyes and oval faces seemingly based on sharks. They behave like pack animals, loping over the roofs of the town and screeching like hyenas as their human prey huddle together in their hiding places. It’s great to see a film so true to the unvarnished spirit of these folk monsters. Danny Huston as Marlowe, the vampire leader, is particularly terrifying.

30 Days is a viscerally brutal film with some exceptionally graphic scenes. It’s uncompromising in its intensity and does not let up. Nor does it strive for cheap effect, the script remaining lean and understated right through to the end credits. Along the way it subtly explores its themes of family, community and sacrifice, without forgetting to serve up some gratifyingly kick-ass moments, such as when bearded man-haystack Beau Brower, the town outsider, takes on the fanged tribe in his snow-plough.

In a genre currently saturated with cynical teen-market remakes and torture porn, here’s a horror film with integrity. If you think Twilight sucks, try this.

Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell (2004, Hodder and Stoughton)

Posted in Books, Fiction on September 4, 2010 by culturecrammer

The very definition of a mixed bag – but this book contains a glittering jewel of contemporary short fiction

With Cloud Atlas, David Mitchell tests his readers’ patience to the limit and gets away with it - just.  Half way through five of the book’s six stories, Mitchell breaks off – sometimes on a cliffhanger, sometimes in mid-sentence – and embarks on the next. Only the sixth story is presented without interruption, an apple core around which the others begin and conclude in sequence. Depending on your point of view this is either an audacious narrative device, or a thin pretext for stringing together a bunch of short stories and calling it a novel.

Sure, there’s a sprinkling of cross-references, and interlinking themes such as imperialism, anthropology and Nietzchean philosophy; protagonists encounter one another’s stories as texts, and some even share mysterious birthmarks: “Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies,” one character tells us suggestively.

This vague air of quasi-mysticism is one of Cloud Atlas’s weaknesses. Another is the degree of pastiche evident throughout, particularly in the first three stories – a journal of a 19th century sea voyage that riffs off Melville and Conrad; a string of confessional letters charting the misadventures of an amoral young aesthete in inter-war Belgium, which reads like John Banville; and a political conspiracy thriller which takes its cue from Watergate-era movies like The Parallax View and The China Syndrome. For another story, a blackly comic farce, Mitchell essentially relocates One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest to a retirement home in Hull.

Thankfully there are plenty of flashes of brilliance, and even at his most derivative Mitchell carries it off with enough verve to keep you turning the page.

But Cloud Atlas’s saving grace comes with the fifth story, ‘An Orison of Sonmi 451′, in which Mitchell delivers a glittering jewel of contemporary short fiction. It’s a slice of dystopian sci-fi set in the Korea of the far future – a totalitarian corpocracy presiding over a privileged class of passive consumers whose every whim is catered for by servile synthetic clones, or ‘fabricants’.  Sonmi is one such drone, her entire world circumscribed by the daily rituals of a fast food diner. The story of how she acquires self-knowledge, escapes her fate and becomes a talismanic figure in a secret resistance movement, is nothing short of scintillating.

Once again, Mitchell’s inspirations are less literary than filmic, paying tribute to the visions of Ridley Scott’s Bladerunner and George Lucas’ THX 1138.  But ‘Orison’ transcends its familiar premise, as Mitchell creates an entire culture in meticulous, glowing detail, a world at once thrillingly alien yet uncomfortably close to home. It’s a cautionary parable of mythic proportions, whose themes continue to resonate in the story that follows, set in an even further-flung future in which humanity has regressed to the iron age.

Mitchell is as at home with the edge-of-your-seat action sequence as he is painting rich narrative vistas.  A capricious talent, he tends to falter when he attempts profundity, but the versatility and potency of his imagination frequently dazzle. A fearless stylist who can turn his hand to almost anything, David Mitchell loves to take risks without a safety net. If you’re willing to forgive the occasional wobble, it’s a high wire act not to be missed.

2012 (Roland Emmerich, 2010)

Posted in Film on April 12, 2010 by culturecrammer

It’s the end of John Cusack’s career as we know it in this apocalyptic yawnathon

2012, as predicted by the Mayans, is the year the world will end. Solar flares have boiled the Earth’s core, unleashing a cataclysm of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis that threaten to ravage the planet’s landmass like so much pie crust.  Down on ground zero is Jackson Curtis (John Cusack), a divorced LA writer whose camping weekend with the kids turns into an epic battle to get his family to safety.

At the helm of this juggernaut is Hollywood’s  master of disaster Roland Emmerich, the man behind box office leviathans like Independence Day, Godzilla, The Day After Tomorrow and 10,000 BC.

Sadly, the most spectacular thing about 2012 is quite how, armed with a blank-cheque budget, Emmerich has managed to mould his earth-shattering subject matter into something so prosaic and uninvolving.

The wheels start to come off early on, as the Curtis clan make their escape by car and plane from a crumbling LA.  In the hands of a Spielberg this would be heart-in-mouth stuff, as all around the fleeing family roads rupture, skyscrapers buckle and chasms gape.  But this is conveyor-belt calamity: as the world gives way beneath them, a hair’s-breadth from death, all Cusack and co can muster is a series of goofy “woooah!” reaction shots. There’s no real sense of danger or consequence. Even the CGI seems phoned-in.

Like its predecessors, 2012 invites us to take a perverse pleasure in witnessing the flimsy constructs of our civilisation topple, symbols of a global system as vulnerable to the avarice of bankers as it is to terrorist attack. Like the resurgence of the horror genre, the return of the disaster movie signals a new age of anxiety for modern audiences. It’s as if we feel ourselves to be living in a world of perpetual imminent collapse, captive to the opaque whims of government and insecure in the knowledge that the rich will always sell us out.

Sure enough, in 2012 the world’s elite buy themselves tickets to safety, leaving the rest of humanity to face unthinkable carnage. To offset this disconsolate message, the film feeds us a miniature morality play – apocalypse is the occasion for Cusack’s failed American father to gain redemption by saving his family from dysfunction and the rival claims of an interloper (his wife’s plastic surgeon boyfriend, played by Thomas McCarthy).

Along the way, Emmerich throws in some spurious emoting, as characters we barely know or care about say tremulous long-distance goodbyes to family members, mere moments before being swept to their deaths by gargantuan walls of water.

John Cusack looks decidedly sheepish throughout and decides to keep his head down as much as one can when one is the protagonist of a blockbuster. Meanwhile Woody Harrelson hams it to high heaven as a crazed conspiracy theorist, and Danny Glover as the President seems content to offer his services as a poor man’s Morgan Freeman.

Insulting in its emotional cheapness and bogus morality, 2012 is the end of the world as a sanctified Disney ride. Worse still, it’s a barely competent exercise that fails to deliver the goods even on its own terms.

Still, the sea looks cool.

Daniel Barenboim conducts the Berlin Staatskapelle @ Royal Festival Hall, 01/02/10

Posted in Classical, Music on February 3, 2010 by culturecrammer

In this series of concerts pairing Beethoven’s piano concertos with orchestral works by Arnold Schoenberg, Daniel Barenboim has found an inspired way of linking two musical revolutionaries who, though separated by centuries, are nevertheless kindred spirits.

The implication of this shared billing is that what Schoenberg did for the music of Brahms and Wagner, Beethoven did for the music of Haydn and Mozart – he made it ‘breathe the air of other planets’.  As if to underline these affinities, tonight in the Five Orchestral Pieces, Barenboim points up the underlying romanticism of Schoenberg’s string writing, which even as it leaves traditional harmonic language behind, is full of echoes of the 19th century.

This series of orchestral miniatures dates from before Schoenberg began to reign in his free-floating chromaticism by introducing the twelve-tone system that would lead to the formal constraints of Serialism.  Loosed from the moorings of tonality, these pieces are shimmering and exotic, with none of the dryness of later works.  In the elegiac solo cello and viola of the second piece, for example, there is surely beauty enough to appease the most conservative of ears.

Yet, judging by the tenor of several conversations during the intermission, these century-old compositions can still provoke perplexity in modern audiences. Though essentially introspective, along the way they manage to be by turns witty, bawdy, barbed and viscerally terrifying.  As juddering stabs of dissonant brass jolt us in our seats, it’s clear Schoenberg still has the power to shock and unsettle.

Barenboim and the superb Berlin Staatskapelle seem utterly at home in this music, and able to flit between the sound-worlds of the respective progenitors of Romanticism and Modernism with ease.  The pleasure Barenboim, conducting from the piano with some wonderfully flamboyant gestures, takes in the verve and wit of Beethoven’s second concerto is palpable. This music is in his blood. He conducts without a score and plays with the spontaneous air of a man observed through his living room window on a Sunday afternoon.

For the fourth concerto, arguably Beethoven’s greatest, we are in for an altogether different order of music-making.  As Barenboim launches into the darkly mysterious opening, we are instantly reminded of just how daring this music was, and of how modern much of it still sounds. With its epic scale, its filigree light and shade, and its superabundance of harmonic invention, the Fourth is like many concertos within one – a dazzling tumult of ideas perfectly realised.

While Barenboim relishes the virtuoso passagework, his approach is the antitheses of the steely precision of a Pollini – his Beethoven is all about flow.  The ear may detect the occasional fluffed note, but Barenboim’s playing has an unerring and irresistible sense of pulse. He gets better and better, dashing off a scintillating take on the first movement cadenza and showing rapt concentration and poise in the magnificent slow movement. Come the third movement Vivace, Barenboim is on fire. By the time he hits the last note he’s won himself a lengthy and unanimous standing ovation.

Star as he is, at the peak of his artistry tonight, one stopped thinking of Barenboim altogether and thought only of Beethoven, as if the composer himself were at the piano. And that is the most we can ask of any musician.

The Alexandria Quartet by Lawrence Durrell (Faber & Faber, 1957-60)

Posted in Books, Fiction on December 3, 2009 by culturecrammer

by Bolokovsky, guest contributor

When Lawrence Durrell published his teratology of novels The Alexandria Quartet (1957-60), he could hardly have been more out of step with the emerging new wave of British fiction.

For although Durrell was born a decade earlier than his near-contemporaries John Osborne, John Braine, Alan Sillitoe and Kinglsey Amis, the publication of the Quartet roughly coincided with Osborne’s Look Back in Anger (1956), Braine’s Room at the Top (1957), Sillitoe’s Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (1958), and Amis’ Take a Girl Like You (1960).

For Durrell, this new generation of British writers – the so called ‘Angry Young Men’ whose kitchen sink realism eschewed any form of glamour or exotica – epitomized everything that he characterized as ‘The English Death’. As he explained: ‘English life is really like an autopsy.  It is so, so dreary.”

By contrast, it’s impossible to understand Durrell without seeing him as he saw himself: a European. Durrell’s heroes were DH Lawrence, Richard Aldington, Robert Graves, Norman Douglas and T.S.Eliot – all writers who considered themselves Europeans first, and British citizens second.

Despite its unfashionable aestheticism, The Alexandria Quartet – comprised of Justine (1957), Balthazar (1958), Mountolive (1958) and Clea (1960) – was a critical and commercial success. Set in Alexandria, Egypt, before and during World War II and taking modern love as their central subject, the four novels describe the same sequence of events from several points of view, allowing individual perspectives to change over time.

Durrell’s high art aesthetic makes no concessions to the reader, but the demands it makes are rewarded with writing which is superbly evocative of its ‘spirit of place’, Alexandria.  The city, a favourite haunt of the Greek modernist poet Cavafy whose unnamed presence pervades these novels, is conjured up in all its extravagant sensuality.

By comparison with the collection of dowdy sparrows that inhabit the work of his peers, Durrell’s characters are fabulous birds of paradise, brilliantly placed in this exotic setting. Alongside the central character/narrator Darley (who seems to represent Durrell), at least three other important figures in the Quartet are writers.

Of these, the most problematic is the novelist Pursewarden, the high priest of aestheticism, scattering aphorisms and philosophical and artistic pronouncements whenever he appears. His portrayal borders on caricature, and at times it is difficult to accept that his pretensions are meant to be taken seriously; nonetheless he, alongside the cross-dressing rogue Scobie, and the alluring Jewess Justine, remain wonderfully memorable characters.

Durrell’s prose, as he describes sexual couplings and political intrigues among the streets and cafe’s of Alexandria, and evokes the atmosphere of the surrounding countryside,  sea, and islands, is startling visual, ornate and intricately worked. Particularly in the first novel Justine, Durrell allows his poetic sensibilities to flow unrestrained, saturating the text with beautiful imagery and an almost febrile intensity.

Durrell himself was critical of his ornate style. In an interview with The Paris Review in 1959, he said of his prose: ‘It’s too juicy…I always feel I am overwriting. I am conscious of the fact that it is one of my major difficulties.”

These self-acknowledged weaknesses aside, at his best Durrell can be compared to such supreme modern prose stylists as Vladimir Nabokov, John Updike and John Banville.  Like them, Durrell may be criticised as favouring style over substance, or accused of being overly elitist and esoteric.

But to the appreciative reader, The Alexandria Quartet is the work of an artist using the full palette of his genius to create an intoxicating mixture of sensual imagery and unforgettable characters.

Susan Boyle – I Dreamed A Dream (Sony) 23/11/ 09

Posted in Music, Pop/Rock on December 1, 2009 by culturecrammer

Here is a voice that has had to swim the vast ringing spaces of Simon Cowell’s cynicism in order to reach us.

Perhaps this explains why for much of I Dreamed A Dream Susan Boyle sounds like she is singing in a wind tunnel. This is not helped by the fact that her much-vaunted vocal assets have been heavily treated – pumped up with the studio equivalent of Botox.  It adds to the artificiality of her already mannered vocal technique, which (perhaps at the insistence of her voice coach) consists largely of piling on layer after layer of wobbling vibrato.

Which isn’t to say there isn’t a voice here, of sorts.  On rare moments when Boyle relaxes into her natural midrange, you can hear it – a kind of long-breathed warble, with enough power to worry the edges off the custard creams in the church halls of West Lothian.

Contrived it may be, but Boyle’s Elaine-Paige-on-steroids singing style is at least preferable to the nasal histrionic whinnying that now seems compulsory for new pop acts.  The fact that she offers an antidote to the generic urban/RnB template surely goes a long way to explaining Boyle’s staggering popularity.

And there’s another saving grace: Cowell has been merciful – there is no opera here.  Instead the repertory ranges from predictable anthems like the title track, through contemporary stadium-pop and the odd nod to her church roots with the likes of Amazing Grace and Silent Night.

Boyle’s take on Wild Horses, the Jagger/Richards paen to the heaven-and-hell pull of heroin, is downright eerie. There’s even a stilted, bloodless rendition of The Monkee’s Daydream Believer that hooks the song up to an iron lung and drains every last dreg of Pop life out of it.  At times the track order is bizarrely incongruous – one minute Boyle’s going all breathy and Bette Midler on us for Cry Me A River, and the next, she’s wading into a pious rendition of Great Thou Art.

There’s a sort of implied biographical narrative underpinning these song choices, which seem to soundtrack Boyle’s years of thwarted ambition and strangulated passion as she stayed at home to care for her ailing mother.

It’s ironic, then, that Boyle, despite striving for effect to an almost fatiguing degree, seems incapable of investing any of these songs with a scintilla of authentic feeling. This is un-music, manicured with pitiless efficiency by Cowell’s production team, with any vestiges of what might have made Boyle’s singing distinctive carefully airbrushed out of the aural picture.

What I Dreamed A Dream exhibits most powerfully is an overwhelming self-consciousness, a morbid awareness of itself as product.  Even as it insinuates itself into our lives, soundtracking our weddings and work-do’s, this record is harbouring a sneaky secret: it’s not really on our, or the music’s, side at all.

Dirty Projectors – Bitte Orca (Domino) 9/8/09

Posted in Music, Pop/Rock on November 30, 2009 by culturecrammer

Some landmark records document a giant transformational leap in a band’s development, marking that moment when good artists become great ones.

Bitte Orca is such a record. That it’s also a strange and wayward affair is no surprise coming from a band whose last album, 2007′s Rise Above, was an attempt by frontman Dave Longstreth to remember and reinterpret the entire Black Flag album Damaged after not hearing it for 15 years.  But what makes Bitte Orca special is the way it manages to combine disorientating, mind-flanging weirdness with a joyous, entirely instinctive pop sensibility.

Instantly, listening to opener ‘Cannibal Resource’, it’s as if Dirty Projectors have rearranged rock’s DNA and installed a new songwriting logic. At once strange and familiar, the song offsets its swaggering rock bass and hand-clap percussion with odd time signatures, tangential guitar riffs and vertiginous modulations in pitch. Like the rest of this record, it pulsates with a supreme sense of freedom and confidence.

Things get better still with the gorgeous ‘Temecula Sunrise’, which soars along on the dovetailing Eastern-flavoured harmonies of singers Amber Coffman and Angel Deradoorian, providing the perfect foil to Longstreth’s caustic warble.  Their girl-group vocals see-saw away in the background as dissonant 12-string finger picking meets flurries of fuzzy, amped-up guitar.  This is pop freed of – or rather reconstructing – cliché, throwing us curve balls while simultaneously riffing off classic motifs from rock’s institutional memory.

In fact, tracing the influences in Bitte Orca is like writing tasting notes for a complex wine; every time you delve into it you’ll pick up a hint of something else. ‘The Bride’ has a lilting, water-borne quality that recalls Starsailor-era Tim Buckley. Elsewhere Longstreth, a music composition graduate, drops in jazz, classical, Middle Eastern and African influences, even a touch of 50’s doo-wop.  There are shades of Devendra Banhart, bluesy Led Zep/White Stripes power riffs, the circular grooves of Steely Dan and the voodoo boogie of vintage Captain Beefheart.  But above all this album rings with the influence of Talking Heads, whose David Byrne is a recent Projectors collaborator.

Then, as if to underline their ability to defy categorisation, the Projectors launch into the avant-R’n’B of ‘Stillness Is The Move’, a procession of booty-jiggling pop hooks filtered through something thrillingly alien. With a lyric paraphrasing Peter Handke’s poem from the Wim Wenders film Wings of Desire, Coffman and Deradoorian’s helium-high vocals ride a Middlle Eastern guitar loop over a glitchy staccato rythmn.  Yearning strings enter the mix as the track builds to a plateau of blissed-out, mystic euphoria. It’s the coolest record Destiny’s Child never made.

This is an album about the longing for transcendence, the state of grace music promises but only delivers in rare glimpses. It’s indie music let off the leash, in which bookish white college kids attain heights of rapture of a kind normally reserved for black soul artists.

More ecstatic word painting follows in ‘Two Doves’, which plays on poetic imagery from the Old Testament text Song of Solomon. Its picked guitar and breathy violin stabs pay loving tribute to Nico’s cover of Jackson Browne’s ‘These Days’ from her album Chelsea Girl, even going so far as to lift a line (“Don’t confront me with my failures…”).  Deradoorian’s vibrato-laden vocal is vulnerable and deeply moving, all the more so for being placed in music that seems to have been mysteriously deconstructed and reassembled.

But it’s on the wildly segueing medley ‘Useful Chamber’ that the Projectors’ sheer reckless verve is at its most jaw-dropping.  A backdrop of morphing synths and chiming, spun-glass guitar is sprayed with sporadic blues riffs; this switches abruptly into a spoken passage, then bursts into a romping chorus plastered in blistering fretwork, before leaping into unearthly vocal modulations that sound like something from another culture, if not another planet. It’s like Ligeti crossed with the Beach Boys.

Old punks might dismiss all this as so much suspect prog-rockery.  But this record is on a relentless quest to transcend its own self-conciousness. The formal experimentation never distracts the music from its main purpose – to communicate urgent, spontaneous joy.

Bitte Orca gloriously reaffirms your faith in pop music’s protean and inexhaustible abilty to reinvent itself, be reborn and live again – even if it has to turn itself inside out to do it.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.