Archive for August, 2009

Prototype (Activision) PS3/XBox 360 Released 12/6/09

Posted in Videogames on August 29, 2009 by culturecrammer

Has Activision produced the ultimate expression of gaming’s will-to-power?

180949-1-2The narratives of videogame culture are rooted in the world of comic books – the stomping grounds of the superhero whose toughest quest is often a struggle to come to terms with the implications of their own astounding powers.

From The Hulk’s anger management issues to the literalised body consciousness of Invisible Girl, comic books both mirror adolescent anxieties and – by turning them into superpowers – provide the ultimate in wish-fulfillment. Their characters get to taste the thrill of superabundant adult power without the constraints or responsibilities that come with it.

Similarly, the lure of the videogame is the chance to remake yourself – bigger, better, faster, stronger. Activision – whose latest game comes with the strapline, ‘Become anything; change everything’ – evidently understand this. Perhaps more than any other game before it, Prototype gives you a sense of unbridled, freakish, unstoppable power – and everything in its sandbox world is designed to reflect that power back at you.

As the hoodie-wearing Alex Mercer, you wake up one day on a mortuary slab to find that you are no longer human, but a shape-shifting genetic prototype capable of consuming people and taking on their form. Handily, you can also transform your limbs into lethal weapons, morphing through an arsenal of blades, shields, hammers, whips and claws like a walking multi-utility knife. Top all this off with superhuman strength and speed, the ability to glide and to scale any surface using adaptive parkour, and it’s unlikely anyone’s going to try to make you eat your homework again.

After thus tooling you up, the game lets you loose in an open-world New York, where it’s time to contend with the now-obligatory apocalyptic virus outbreak scenario. Within minutes, Prototype plunges you into an intense battle with strike teams, giant mutant beasts and hordes of shrieking Infected, as the city’s downtown is enveloped in a viral red mist.  Before you know it you’re racing up the sides of buildings, launching yourself at helicopter gunships and sending tentacles erupting from your body, under the feet of panicking civilians, and up through rip-holes in the concrete streets.

115784-2-screenshot

It’s one of the most breathlessly thrilling openings in gaming history; there’s a very real sense of kinetic, frenzied chaos, and the game engine manages to keep the frame-rate well on top of the action despite a gobsmacking number of antagonists on screen.

Having given you a taste of the game at full tilt, Activision set the clock back and your abilities along with it. From here you must progressively power up – no bad thing, as there’s so much to enjoy about being Alex, even on his lowest setting. Your parkour skills allow you to effortlessly negotiate every surface of the city with a few fluid movements. Soon you’re swooping and gliding, scaling skyscrapers, plunging hundreds of feet to street level and bounding over the heads of spooked pedestrians. You can grab civilians and rag-doll them around at comically frenzied speeds, or hurl cars around like toys. The game is also exceptionally and imaginatively violent: enemies can be cut in half horizontally, torn in half vertically, have holes punched clean through them, be decapitated, skewered, and even used as projectiles.

prototype-x-box-360

As well as its obvious link to the Grand Theft Auto series, Prototype owes a clear debt to Crackdown – not to mention the undercover gameplay of Assassin’s Creed and some aesthetic and conceptual borrowings from The Darkness.  Graphically, Prototype isn’t pushing any envelopes. Alex himself is well animated, but the city is rendered in crude brush strokes compared to the stunning pointillism of GTA IV.  Yet overall, the environment convinces. It’s in moments of recreation and repose that you find much of the game’s atmosphere: looking down over rooftops and seeing skirmishes playing out below you, there’s a real sense that mutants are sporadically wreaking havoc on an organic living city.

Prototype‘s ‘deceive or destroy’ gameplay promises a lot of depth, and initially at least, it delivers.  It seems to encourage a genuinely strategic approach as you scope military bases and choose the right moment and entry point from which to attack or surreptitiously consume the identity of a target.

But beyond the immediate charms of its malleable open-play world, you soon come up against its limitations. The illusion ofstrategic play collapses as you become overtly conscious of the underlying game mechanics. Your choices start to feel arbitrary – merely a matter of triggering  set pieces designed to lead you into the familiar cycles of repetitive, mash-em-up gameplay. Like Assasin’s Creed, which was a painting pretending to be a game, Protoype‘s depth is skin-deep, and the game feels like a rehearsal for a full experience that may only be realised in its sequel.

One day a developer will create a sandbox world with real depth and majesty, in which your decisions genuinely feel autonomous and success is not just about learning to outsmart the pre-patterned responses of the AI.  While Activision have inched a step nearer that goal, they’ve fallen short of the giant strides the game claims to make in the sandbox genre. Thrilling as it is at its frenzied best, ultimately Prototype fails to break the mould.

Cornershop – Judy Sucks A Lemon For Breakfast (Ample Play) Released: 27/7/09

Posted in Pop/Rock on August 27, 2009 by culturecrammer

Tjinder Singh still has his hand jammed in the sweetie jar of vintage British pop

judy sucks a lemon

It’s seven years since the last installment of the Cornershop saga arrived in the form of the brilliantly-named Handcream For A Generation.  Almost a generation on, Tjinder Singh and co may be rearing children but they’re still bedroom-mirror romantics with one foot stuck firmly in the days of the Ford Cortina. If anything, the nostalgia dial has been turned up: Judy Sucks A Lemon For Breakfast is an album that often seems to be playing on a dansette in a glitterball-lit corner of Hanif Kureishi’s frontal lobe.

Opener “Who Fingered Rock and Roll” is a melange of vintage Stones riffs and spangly Bolan boogie that tethers its ‘yeah yeah yeahs’ to a punky message about the besmirching of our collective pop innocence. It’s followed by “Soul School”, a melodic, sitar-drenched tribute to 1970s adolescence, evoking long summer Saturday afternoons listening to seven-inch singles round your mate’s house.

The retro theme continues on the title track. It starts by walking an irresistible blues-boogie bassline, adds swinging harmonies, bursts of machine gun fire and – wonderfully – a bassoon, and culminates in a soaring climax of righteous soul vocals. Tjinder still has a knack of slinging around cool-sounding nonsense phrases (‘Up-blues rock is the outta town rock’, etc) pitched somewhere between nursery rhyme and revolutionary slogan.

“‘Free Love” is a sublime, strings-laden trip into traditional Punjabi folk filtered backwards through The Beatles’ “Tomorrow Never Knows”, while the single “The Roll-Off Characteristics (Of History in the Making)” breezes by on a magic carpet ride of honky tonk piano, crisp guitar licks and delicious chunks of burnished trombone. As he assures us that, ‘War ain’t nothing but bad technical plip-plop,’ Tjinder sounds more than ever like he’s singing the theme to a particularly hip children’s TV program.

cornershop“Operation Push”, a paean to the delights of dub and the era that produced it, piles on layers of echo chamber and jets of juddering sub-bass to celebrate ‘The last song that the world ever sung’.  After a straightforward cover of Dylan’s “The Mighty Quinn” (the Manfred Mann version was apparently the first single the young Tjinder ever bought), “The Constant Springs” meanders along passably, while instrumental “Chamchu” is an agreeable dub-bhangra soundclash.

By the time we roll around to “The Turned On Truth” – 17 epic minutes of blissed-out, redemptive gospel wrapped around a riff resurrected from “Brimful of Asha” – it feels like a cheeky, self-referential triumph, albeit far too bloody long.

Cornershop are still holding a candle for an idealised pop moment fixed in time and space; a semi-mythical golden age when melting-pot Britain was the musical crossroads of the world. This place has precise co-ordinates and Cornershop always know their way back there. They’re still writing love letters to their record collections, and there are times when Judy feels a little too much like a commemorative musical photo album.

But when the irrepressible Cornershop charm kicks in, such thoughts seem churlish. Judy is as wide-eyed and upbeat as indie pop will get this year, and when it sounds this fresh, Cornershop’s revolutionary retro is well worth a reprise.

Pere Ubu – Long Live Pere Ubu! (Cooking Vinyl) Released: 14/9/09

Posted in Music, Pop/Rock on August 25, 2009 by culturecrammer

Cleveland’s finest pay tribute to the granddaddy of Dada

long live pere ubu!

No one approaches a Pere Ubu record expecting an easy ride. But David Thomas’s musical adaptation of Alfred Jarry’s notorious proto-absurdist play Ubu Roi – from which the band took their name when they formed in 1975 – makes for perverse listening even by their own standards.

This is probably as it should be. After all, the original provoked a riot in the theatre when it premiered in Paris in 1896. Ubu is Jarry’s bourgeois everyman – a grotesque, Punch-like figure, gluttonous, infantile, cruel and cowardly. Egged on by his equally unpleasant wife Mere Ubu, he spearheads a plot to murder the King of Poland, accedes to the crown, and sets about becoming the worst kind of despot.

What follows is a vicious political satire that parodies a number of Shakespearean plotlines including Macbeth and Hamlet. For a flavour of its surreal, farcical energy one need only consider the cast of characters, which includes the Polish princes Boleslas, Boggerlas, and Ladislas, The Whole Russian Army, The Whole Polish Army, assorted Lackeys of Phynance, something called The Disembraining Machine, and A Bear.

The songs on Long Live Pere Ubu! form part of a six act radio play adapted from Jarry’s text by David Thomas, joined here by ex-Communards vocalist Sarah Jane Morris as Mere Ubu. Needless to say, a seminal avant-garde work does not good music guarantee (apparently Paul McCartney read Jarry’s play while writing the lyrics for “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer”).  But once you tune into its crazed frequency, Ubu! is an absolute scream.

Warm-up track “Ubu Overture” sounds like the reverberations of Satan’s tuning fork punctuated by filthy belching noises: “Merde…erer!” Thomas growls in a voice pitch with wickedness. “Song Of the Grocery Police” finds Mere Ubu in Lady Macbeth mode, exhorting her whimpering husband to regicide: ‘Kill them all / Have a ball,’ she urges, as he hankers pathetically after a ‘big sombrero’.  The darkly hilarious “March of Greed” is an inane stomp featuring a call-and-response routine between Ubu and his court of arse-licking sycophants. ‘I agree to everything,’ he shrugs happily as they cheer him along the fast-track to tyranny.

There’s no mistaking we’re back in the Ubu sound world – but along with the signature electronic dissonance and stabbing, post-punk guitar, there’s a touch of the gallows theatricality of The Birthday Party and the dalfred jarryustbowl holler of Tom Waits at his scratchiest. Most of all though, Ubu! resounds with the influence of Captain Beefheart circa Doc at the Radar Station or Ice Cream for Crow.

“Big Sombrero (Love Theme)” sees Ubu opening a ministerial meeting with the command: ‘Bring me the shitter hook / Bring me the finance book!’  Beneath Thomas’s coruscating, gravel-throated vocal there’s a cacophony of pig squeals and shrieks, hydraulic whirring noises, the sound of cold machinery in terminal dysfunction. ‘Now bring all of the judges in,’ he barks, announcing plans to tax the dead and declaring that dissenters will be tossed ‘into the pig-pincher.’

By “Bring Me The Head”, Ubu’s power is total – as his wife reports: ‘No more finance, justice or law / Into his belly he’s gobbled them all.’  For “Road to Reason”, a funky thrash of wire-wool guitar and frantic theremin, Thomas reverts to his trademark bubblegum baby voice to observe with satisfaction: ‘Everywhere you look you can see burned down houses and people bent double under the weight of Finance.’

The heart-knocking “Watching the Pigeons” describes Ubu’s defeat at the hands of the Russians, while “Snowy Livonia” underlines the pathos of the dethroned Ubu’s escape to France with a sad little refrain on electric piano. Perhaps the most deliciously twisted episode of all is “The Story so far”, eight minutes of sweating dream delirium that takes us on a trip into Ubu’s subconscious.  It ends with Ubu threatening his wife with an elaborate torture ritual whose delights include ‘penetration of the little wooden stick…extraction of the brain through the fingernails…not to mention the opening of the bladderine…’

On its own terms, as a bold experiment in fusing spoken word with post-rock, post-punk and ambient electronica, Long Live Pere Ubu! is an unqualified success.  Thomas’s adaptation of the play’s skewed, dark poetry is brilliant. But does it work as a pop record?  Intermittently, yes. Parts of it would clearly be more effective as theatre, and its weakest moments take it perilously close to Frank Zappa’s tiresome burlesques. At it’s best though, it’s trippy, twisted genius. Hardcore Ubu fans will love it.

Sarah Jane Morris’s self-consciously theatrical vocals do the album no favours. Her singing is mannered, thick with flabby jazz singer cliches. By contrast, the way David Thomas brings Ubu to life with his choked, sad, infantile little gurgle makes the character human, and therefore all the more disturbing.

As in all the best epics, at the end of the chapter there’s a new horizon. For the album’s closer, “Elsinor and Beyond”, we join Ubu as he sets sail on his escape boat. Perking up, the banished tyrant turns to his wife and says:  ‘I sense that many fine adventures lie ahead of us.’  Full speed ahead, Mr Thomas.

Moon (Duncan Jones, 2009)

Posted in Film on August 21, 2009 by culturecrammer

samfront

The brainchild of Duncan Jones, aka Zowie ‘my dad’s David’ Bowie, Moon is one of the finest directorial debuts in recent film history. It’s also a career-defining movie for Sam Rockwell, who is a revelation as moon miner Sam Bell, the sole human presence on a lunar base maintained by a computer.

On the far side of the moon, Lunar Industries employee Sam oversees the harvesting of the Helium-3 isotope, which has become humanity’s primary fuel source. Four enormous automated machines, each named after one of the Gospels, rumble over the lunar surface, chewing up rock.

Sam is nearing the end of a three year haul, just two weeks from fulfilling his contract and going home. Long-haired, bearded and a little cracked, he talks to himself as he counts down the days, with only the occasional video message from his wife and daughter to sustain him. His sole companion is the base computer, GERTY, a descendant of 2001’s HAL, voiced by Kevin Spacey.

When Sam crashes a moon buggy while attempting a routine repair, he wakes up in sick bay with no recollection of the accident. Disobeying company orders he sets out on a salvage mission and drags a body from the cockpit – only to find tmoonhat he has rescued his own clone. Now he really is talking to himself. But these are two very different Sams: one the kooky veteran moon-dweller and the other, himself as he was three years ago – a crew-cutted space jock with anger management issues.

The exchanges between the older, wiser Sam and his headstrong younger self – such as the scene in which he teaches his double the ‘Zen’ of ping-pong – are beautifully done. The Sams bicker, fight and sulk like twin siblings, but between them they gradually uncover the truth: they are just the latest in a series of clones manufactured by their employer,  and their selfhood and sanity hangs on the recycled memories of the original and replays of long-obsolete family messages.

This gives rise to the existential dilemma on which the film pivots. Moon asks the question: how much can you take away from a person before they cease to be a person at all? It also has timely things to say, in the age of Facebook, about how dependent we are on mediated experience and received narratives to create meaning and define our identities.

The character Sam Rockwell creates is full of beautifully observed idiosyncrasies. By the time his world begins to unravel, you care desperately about him. This performance combines with the gritty pathos and humane wit of the script to produce one of the most achingly sad films in years – a heartrending essay in loss.

sam_rockwell_moon_movie_imageBut it’s the restraint it exercises that makes Moon so powerful. At every juncture, the film refuses to indulge itself or to sentimentalise. Jones resists milking the script for cheap emotional pay offs - as he so easily could, for example, in the scene where the ailing Sam makes a long distance phone call home from the lunar surface. Instead, it’s a masterpiece of understatement. As he makes a series of crushing discoveries about his family, Rockwell silently lets them register on his face before saying simply: “That’s enough”.

Anyone who grew up in the ’70s will recognise Moon’s vision of the future. Largely CGI-free, it takes its aesthetic from period films and TV series – from Silent Running to Space 1999 – and from Andre Tarkovsky’s existential space drama Solaris, as well as the obvious sci-fi landmarks by the likes of Ridley Scott and Kubrick. The scenes on the moon’s surface have a grainy quality reminiscent of vintage NASA footage, while the technology – all trundling box buggies throwing up moon dust – has a prosaic, Corgi-toy functionality. The grinding tedium and loneliness of lunar living are brilliantly evoked.

This sense of belonging to a golden era also applies to Moon‘s directorial style. Though never ponderous, the film takes such a spare, slow-burning approach to storytelling, and employs such economy of means, it harks back to a time when less really was more.

Moon takeesq-moon-2-0609-lg-32637364s on an almost metaphysical quality as the film nears its end, and the denoument includes a moment where Sam effectively experiences his own simultaneous death and rebirth, recalling the star child scene that closes Kubrick’s 2001. The story of the castaway who comes face to face with himself is in the long tradition of the ‘Robinsonade’ stretching back to Defoe’s original Crusoe. Moon takes this idea, makes it literal, and runs with it. And in using the clone theme to explore the relationship between experience, memory and identity, it picks up where Bladerunner left off.

But Moon is no replicant. It wears its influences proudly, but it’s the product of a singular talent, a mainstream film of rare integrity. In fact, justly revered as its landmark forbears are, none of them have quite the emotional gravity, the humanity, of Moon.

 

Iggy and the corporate stooges

Posted in Music, Pop/Rock on August 14, 2009 by culturecrammer

It’s Monday morning. Between the tracks on one of London’s greyest City-bound commuter routes, rain pummels rubbish. On a poster above the platform, trying to look amiable in an absurd pair of aviator goggles, is the man who invented punk rock, perhaps the most invincible icon of rock and roll’s anarchic spirit still living. Today though, he and several of the commuters have something in common, a bond if you will: they’rswiftcovere insurance salesmen.

The ad campaign for Swiftcover motor insurance has made Iggy Pop the poster boy of Sellout. With Pop’s long-suffering torso plastered across advertising hoardings, TV spots and online commercials, it’s as if the scarred hide of rock and roll itself has finally been scalped by The Man like a trophy pelt.

This campaign shouldn’t work. For starters, you’d think that any punter who attaches meaning or value to Iggy Pop would hold Swiftcover in contempt for trying to appropriate him and go out of their way to deny the company their custom. And as for the nonplussed masses to whom Iggy means nothing, surely they’re left wondering why a cadaverous talking scrotum is bounding around the screen trying to sell them an insurance policy?

But bafflingly, this unholy union has been a runaway success. As Tina Shortle, the company’s marketing director explained with satisfaction: ‘Iggy Pop and swiftcover.com have made motor insurance interesting for a change, increasing awareness of swiftcover.com and sending our sales soaring by almost a third.’

Then in April came a delicious irony: the Advertising Standards Agency ruled that the TV ad was misleading after it emerged that Swiftcover refused to cover musicians because they were deemed too high risk (a not unwise policy – the Stooges’ own drummer Scott Asheton once nearly killed the whole band by driving their tour bus into a low bridge, taking off its roof). After an embarrassing media hoo-ha Swiftcover revoked this rule. Despite the controversy Tina Shortle said the firm would stick with Iggy, adding: ‘Swiftcover.com chose Iggy Pop as the face of its advertising because he loves life.’

Let’s just remind ourselves who we’re talking about here. This is a man who, in his deranged and glorious prime, resembled nothing so much as the reanimated corpse of your smack-addled, transgender granny on steroids. PerhIggyaps Tina would revise her view of Iggy as a life-affirming go-getter if she were transported back to 1973 and found him tapping a vein backstage, visions of swastikas in his head, blood coursing down the cigarette-burned, bottle-slashed horseflesh of his chest?

As for Iggy, I’d like to believe that he was compelled to do the Swiftcover deal for tax reasons (Bowie covered ‘China Girl’ in 1983 so that his friend, then facing bankruptcy, could use the royalties to pay off the taxman). After all, even the late Bill Hicks, who famously declared musicians who did commercials ‘off the artistic roll call forever’, made an exception for Willie Nelson on account of the staggering sums he owed to the IRS.

Whatever the reason, let’s hope it was worth it, because if the online messageboards are anything to go by, the ads have cost him at least as much in kudos as they’ve earned him in cash. Assuming Iggy even thinks about himself as a global brand, it’s hard to imagine a surer way to ransack everything he ever stood for. Iggy Pop has something no man can buy. He is the godhead, the totem of punk rock, his place in rock history everlasting and unassailable. What does he do with this priceless asset?  He sells it. In one 30-second piece to camera, he neutralises the charge of his iconic presence so that, like a soiled prophylactic, it can never be used again.

It’s tempting to interpret this breathtaking disregard for his own legacy as Iggy’s way of sticking two fingers up at the world in a cynical, rock and roll kind of way. But that doesn’t rub. After all, in interviews Iggy’s spoken of how, as the lonely, alienated teenager James Osterberg growing up in Ann Arbor, Michigan, music was the key that allowed him to escape the stultifying life his parents had planned for him. He of all people understands the soul-saving, talismanic power of rock and roll. Would he have been quite so inspired if his heroes (Sun Ra, Fats Waller) had appeared on his parents’ TV set selling washing machines?

Of course, none of this is new to pop culture. It’s what the Situationists called recuperation, the process whereby radical ideas and images become safe and commodified – or as The Clash more pithily put it, ‘turning rebellion into money’ – and it’s been going on at least since Elvis.  But with Iggy’s ad, it’s hard not to feel that one of rock and roll’s last outposts has fallen. Iggy was a cultural marker, a bright orange buoy bobbing on the perimeter of the corporate no-swim zone.  Now, thanks to Swiftcover, the heart-pumping bass intro of  ‘Loose”  will never sound the same again; nor will we hear the opening chords of “The Passenger ” without Iggy jiggling around our minds’ eye like a children’s’ TV presenter, rhapsodising about ease of access to his policy documents.

I have a theory that the marketing people know this. In fact, it may be time to posit the existence within the PR/advertising industry of a radical cell of cultural counter-insurgents – a kind of marketing Special Ops – tasked with mopping up every last pocket of resistance from the denuded landscape of our I-Pods. For this crack unit of arch-postmodernists, the cultural meanings we hold most dear are mere surfaces of play from which to launch their next assault on all that is vital and alive.  They specialise in appropriating songs or artists that represent attempts to comment on or transcend the culture, as if to prove beyond doubt that all will be consumed in a vast, suffocating tarpaulin of banality. That’s why Alice Cooper is flogging Aviva insurance and Johnny Rotten is busy spreading for Country Life butter. These loveable old dears are now quaint relics from a bygone age of signification.

Similarly, Blur ‘s “The Universal”, a song that serenades the falling away of meaning in a world of homogenous satellite TV consumerism, now soundtracks an ad for British Gas. After this, to hear Damon Albarn sing ‘Yes, the future has been sold,’ is truly to bite into the dark centre of a bitter chocolate bar called Irony. As for the car companies, from Nick Drake’s “Pink Moon” (Volkswagen) to The Fall’s “Touch Sensetive” (Vauxhall), no song is safe.

So it’s in this same spirit, and to hurry the total annihilation of all forms of cultural resistance, that I nominate the top five candidates for future assimilation, in reverse order:

5. Nirvan6q9ipp5a – “Smells Like Teen Spirit”

We owe it to the memory of Kurt Cobain to use this deodorant ad-inspired grunge behemoth on a beer commercial, thus dispatching it back to the kingdom from whence it came.

4. Pvans-sk8-hi-sl-supreme-public-enemy-black-yellowublic Enemy – “Fight The Power ”

This anti-establishment classic is just the thing to bring a touch of revolutionary frisson to your brand. Prise it free of its context and suddenly it’s all about your right to wear a new line of trainer called ‘Black Panther’, fresh from the sweatshops.

3PinkFloydMoney. Pink Floyd – “Money”

I demand that Roger Waters’ anti-capitalist tirade be used immediately to introduce us to a new kind of credit card.

2. Joy Divisiatmosphereon – “Atmosphere”

Ian Curtis’ visionary swansong lost its cherry to First Direct at the turn of the millenium. But its austere beauty can still produce goosebumps. To finish it off, let’s make “Atmosphere” soundtrack a heavy rotation, moody black-and-white ad for a unisex fragrance of the same name.

1. Bill Hickshicks-flag

This is the one spoken of in hushed tones in the corridors of their tall glass buildings.  Fifteen years after his untimely death, the scourge of sellout is now ripe for recuperation.  Re-animate him via some CGI trickery, and Bill’s cool rebel stance could sell anything you’d care to name to the under-35s.

Antichrist (Lars von Trier, 2009)

Posted in Film on August 12, 2009 by culturecrammer

(Spoiler alert)antichrist-April26-photos-full02

Whatever you think of Antichrist, you’d be hard pressed to deny that Lars von Trier’s choice of music for the opening scene is a masterly stroke. Soundtracked by the aria “Lascia ch’io pianga” from Handel’s opera Rinaldo, the prologue depicts, in exquisite slow-motion monochrome, the death of a toddler in a fall from his bedroom window as his parents make love in the next room. It is breathtaking: you cannot but be gripped by the gorgeous play of lenses on objects, the rhythm of the editing as the film breathes in time with Handel’s sorrowing score. 

Yet given its harrowing subject matter, there’s something almost indecent about this stylised beauty, which has the airbrushed quality of a Calvin Klein ad. It’s one of a number of scenes that take the film perilously close to kitsch. This is something Handel himself would have understood – the drippingly sensual, pleasure-from-pain aesthetic of the Baroque exulted in such paradoxes. Handel’s aria reminds us that, long before Antichrist, Western art trod a thin line between sublime transcendence and the shabby emotional voyeurism of which von Trier is regularly accused.

Willem Dafoe and Charlotte Gainsbourg play the unnamed couple struggling to come to terms with their son’s death. She, an academic, is experiencing acute anxiety attacks as part of what her doctor calls “atypical grief”.  Her husband, a therapist, insists on taking charge of her treatment himself. He demands that she face her fears, and asks her to name the place she feels most vulnerable.

Her answer: Eden, an isolated cabin in the woods where she spent the previous summer alone with her little boy, attempting to finish her thesis on ‘Gynocide’ – a study of the witch-hunts used for centuries as a means of exerting Antichrist-03patriarchal control over women’s bodies. As the couple cross a bridge to enter the woods, it’s clear that, like the ‘Zone’ in Andre Tarkovsky’s film Stalker, Eden is a state of mind, a psychological landscape they must negotiate if they are to free themselves of their burden of guilt and grief.

As well as referencing Tarkovsky, Antichrist owes an unmistakeable debt to Nick Roeg’s Don’t Look Now, which also begins with the death of a child at home.  Like Roeg, von Trier employs radical visual and aural techniques to evoke the psychological states of his characters: destabilising perspectives, CGI doctoring, eerie off-camera noises and tremulous, misted close-ups. The film is shot with a stunning, dreamlike lucidity by British cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle, a veteran of Dogme films who recently won an Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire.  Most important of all, Don’t Look Now and Antichrist share the same central theme – the terrifying intrusion of the supernatural into a rationalistic worldview.  Like Donald Sutherland’s character John Baxter, Dafoe desperately attempts to protect his wife from what he insists is a mental imbalance, while shoring up his own belief system against mounting evidence to the contrary.

“Nature is Satan’s church,” says Gainsbourg mid-way into the film, as a relentless rain of acorns ominously pounds the roof of the cabin. From here on in von Trier cranks up the weirdness: lichen grows on Defoe’s hand as he sleeps; the woods themselves seem to seethe with a dread malevolence, until the film begins to resemble an arthouse Evil Dead.  As the therapy sessions continue, we learn that Gainsbourg has begun to internalise the very narrative she set out to critique – namely that women, as vessels of nature, are themselves evil. Then Defoe discovers disturbing evidence of low-level child abuse that is corroborated by the toddler’s autopsy report. It seems that, shut away in the woods that summer with only her child and her research for company, his wife suffered some kind of mental breakdown. 

Yet while it offers abundant explanations for its characters’ behaviour, Antichrist wilfully blurs the line between psychology and the occult.  Gainsbourg’s mental state is increasingly suggestive of possession; we get the feeling she is channelling the pain of her historical ‘sisters’, whose partially submerged bodies litter the forest floor like white roots. When, as the film nears its climax, Dafoe seeks refuge in the woods, nature conspires with her against him. The doe, fox and raven that earlier visited Dafoe in a series of hallucinatory episodes have by now become her ‘familiars’.

The Wild Woman is a familiar (if rather dated) archetype of Feminist discourse, and Gainsbourg’s derangement is like a more extreme version of the protagonist’s meltdown in Margaret Atwood’s 1979 novel Surfacing. But what makes Gainsbourg’s character ‘antichrist’ – at least in her own mind – is not her alliance with nature or the antichrist_2occult, but her culpability in the death of her child. This is civilised society’s ultimate taboo, the worst – and paradoxically most ‘unnatural’ – offence a woman can commit. Her guilt accuses her of prizing her own sexual fulfilment over the safety of her child, so that when she metes out punishment, she targets first her husband’s and then her own genitals. The violence Gainsbourg wreaks is harrowing. As she crushes her husband’s groin and then masturbates him to an unconscious, bloody climax; drills through his calf with a millstone; and performs a self-clitoridectomy with a pair of rusty scissors, her actions approach the demonic. They also speak of a bottomless despair.

To some extent we are invited to see Gainsbourg’s hysterical frenzies of violence as an anguished response to male absence and abandonment.  Dafoe is guilty of both arrogance and detachment in his emotionally distanced and controlling response to his wife’s grief.  He turns her into a patient, when we sense that what she needs most is emotional reassurance, intimacy and love.  Nevertheless, such psychological backgrounding remains hopelessly inadequate to ‘explain’ her behaviour.

Antichrist is probably von Trier’s most personal film. Gripped by clinical depression during production, he has spoken of its completion as a form of therapy. Like its predecessors, Antichrist has been widely accused of misogyny. But von Trier’s latest film is much less vulnerable to this charge than is the ‘emotional pornography’ (Bjork) of Breaking the Waves and Dancer in the Dark.  In these earlier films, von Trier behaves much more like Dafoe: staying at a distance, manipulating his subjects from behind the camera with a cold-eyed clarity. In the terrible intimacy of Antichrist, there is no hiding place for a voyeur director.  In fact, Gainsbourg has said that while making the film she felt strongly that she was von Trier.familiars

But to understand a film like Antichrist, we need to consider it in the context of von Trier’s wider preoccupations.  Like French novelist Michel Houellebecq – another enfant terrible of his genre – von Trier is in revolt against his own permissive upbringing and the values of his nudist Communist parents. He has a peculiarly Scandinavian sense of the frailty and limitations of rational humanism and social planning. His target is liberalism rather than conservatism, and as far back as The Idiots his films have been subversive attacks on liberal orthodoxy. But where his earlier work – from Breaking The Waves through to Dogville and Manderlay – pivots on the tension between society and the individual, in Antichrist we have merely man and woman, the original social unit.

A refutation of the hippy concept of nature as a benign force, von Trier’s Eden is a fallen kingdom where chaos reigns. Defoe’s clinical training blinds him to the unpredictable currents pulsing under the surface of reality. When Dafoe reminds Gainsbourg of the tens of thousands of innocents sent to their deaths in witch hunts engineered by men, her strange answer is: “Sometimes I forget.”  It’s as if the liberal consensus view of history is simply a convenient, comforting narrative with which to fend off more disturbing possibilities.   This is the real nightmare of Antichrist – that the rational constructions on which we rely for a secure view of the world are merely that: flimsy constructs that, once relinquished, leave us face to face with ancient fears and our own destructive impulses.

Antichrist is riddled with ambiguity and paradox. It’s a film which often seems to ask us to believe several contradictory things at once, and to interpret phenomena on multiple levels – as coincidence and symbol; as simultaneously real, psychological and supernatural. There are as many obstacles to interpretation in the film as there are aids to it. As in his earlier work, von Trier refuses to allow the viewer to be a passive recipient of the narrative. Instead, he makes viewers work hard, challenging them to participate in ‘editing’ – or making sense of – the film, and he does this so provocatively that at times it threatens to short-circuit the film itself.  As well as recklessly abusing the director-viewer relationship, von Trier’s films everywhere risk kitsch and ridiculousness. This applies even to the puzzling epilogue of Antichrist, in which Dafoe, living on berries as he makes his way back to civilisation, has a vision of hundreds of women walking uphill out of the valley, in what seems to be a processional of the spirits of Gainsbourg’s ‘sisters’.

It’s no wonder that von Trier’s films produce an ambivalent response in the viewer. He is himself conflicted – one might even view the couple in Antichrist as warring components of his own soul or psyche. Perhaps the epilogue, with its attempt at redemptive, eulogising closure, can be read as von Trier’s attempt to reconcile – to bring peace to – the forces he has unleashed on the screen.

Bruno’s foreplay is hit-and-miss – but Straight Dave provides the money shot

Posted in Film on August 7, 2009 by culturecrammer

(Spoiler alert)

EVER since Ali G first donned his bling, there’s been a strain of look-at-me, need-to-please populism in Sacha Baron Cohen’s work that has threatened to undermine the political charge that makes his best situationist pranks so painful, so powerful, and so funny.  In Bruno, far more than in its brilliant predecessor, there are just too many contrived and ill-judged stunts that reveal little other than Baron Cohen’s desperate need to shock and his reliance on the often unforthcoming responses of others to make his comedy work.

bruno-06

Some of these encounters feel like no more than cheap ill-spirited assaults on the dignity of the person concerned - whose function is simply to facilitate or passively witness the gag. Bruno reaches its nadir early on with a scene in which Baron Cohen mimes fellating the ghost of a deceased member of Milli Vanilli in front of a merely nonplussed, seen-it-all Hollywood psychic.  Scenes like this hold no political or social resonance and pay little comedic dividend; nor are they transgressive – especially when the ‘target’ is being paid to be there in the first place.

But at his most inspired, Baron Cohen’s ability to unleash volcanic social forces and make them play out on the screen can still be breathtaking.  The dénouement of Bruno is one such moment – and it’s a stroke of genius that redeems and validates all that has gone before it.

Bruno is a 19-year-old Austrian fashionista who decamps (sic) to America in a desperate quest to attain fame at all costs.  Acting on the theory that only straight guys win in Hollywood (such as his heroes Tom Cruise and Kevin Spacey), Bruno launches a new cable show hosted by his heterosexual alter-ego, Straight Dave.

According to reports in the Post Chronicle, a local advertising campaign in Fort Smith, Arkansas for “Straight Dave’s Man Slammin’ Max Out” promised a night of hardcore mixed martial arts cage fighting and one dollar beers.  Result: a crowd of evolutionary-throwback rednecks and their white trash WAGS show up and are duly whipped into a gay-baiting blood-frenzy by Bruno who, as Straight Dave, has reinvented himelf via a handlebar moustache and flannel shirt.

straightdave

But when his masculinity is challenged by his former assistant and besotted ex-lover Lutz,  Straight Dave invites him into the cage for a face off – only to snog his face off.  The two men’s emotional reunion rapidly decends into an orgy of pants-down heavy petting, slo-mo soundtracked by Maria Carey.

The gobsmakcked onlookers roar with hatred; their faces register actual physical pain; one man actually cries, such is his sense of crisis and betrayal. We hear blood-curdling howls of frustration, and as mono-browed Neanderthals hurl seats at the ring, we’re left in no doubt that were it not for the cage, they would be tearing the two men to pieces.

It’s a riveting spectacle: as the cameras are trained on their faces, it’s clear the show’s audience have themselves become the show. We are safe on our side of the cinema screen, just as Baron Cohen is in his cage, and from our reverse viewpoint through the bars, the crowd both look and behave like caged animals. The inescapable message: this is the face of homophobia, and boy is it ugly. In both concept and execution it’s a brave and brilliant achievement.

The impossibility of an island: reflections on Lionel Richie’s ‘All Night Long’

Posted in Music, Pop/Rock on August 6, 2009 by culturecrammer

lionel_richie_all_night_longThere’s a slight breeze coming in from the ocean, and neon lights are fizzing on across the bay. As the sun falls into the sea, glamorous night creatures step from water launches and out from under beach canopies. Waiters in white bow ties dispense luminous cocktails.  With the languid nonchalance of a man on his third Malibu, Lionel Richie beckons to us, offering to take us deep into the balmy nocturnal dream-world of pop, the night that never ends:

“Well, my friends the time has come / Raise the roof and have some fun / Throw away the work to be done / Let the music play on (play on, play on, play on…)”

The cheesy echo, cod-Caribbean vocals and get-your-groove-on lyrics are just some of the guilty pleasures to be had from All Night Long, which gave Richie a US Number 1 hit in 1983. 

Released a year after Thriller set new standards for pop-soul production, All Night Long saw Richie and Commodores producer James Carmichael deliver an undulating, teflon-smooth sound worthy of Quincy Jones at his finest.  At six minutes 25 seconds for the album version, All Night Long is a long pop song.  In fact it’s a multi-layered epic, seemingly comprising several songs in one, full of gear shifts and detours celebrating the studio-as-instrument.

But it is also a work of supreme economy in which nothing is wasted and every part serves the whole.  Behind its laid back, sun-kissed vibe it is slick, hair-gelled, and shoulder-padded. The song sounds like it should have soundtracked a pilot episode of Miami Vice and what’s more, it did. Everything about the sound of this record is white leather interior: air-brushed, classy in a quintessetially 80’s way. It’s a pulsing orgasmatron of studio effects, shimmering strings, synthesised horn stabs and complex percussion, all designed with machine-tool precision to get your feet moving.

Yet this is authentic black music, not white yuppie soul, and like all the best pop songs it transcends its own calculations.  Nowhere is this more apparent that the remarkable chant section, in which Richie does his damnedest to convince us that a roving street festival has just broken into the studio.  We hear shouting, crowd noises, the blaring horns of a carnival parade, a xylophone suggesting a Trinidadian street band:

“Come join our party, see how we play!” Richie urges, before the song launches into a call-and-response exchange seemingly pieced together from snatches of Creole, Trinidadian and Swahili:

”Jambo nipe senti moja
(Yeah, jambo, jambo)
Way to party o’ we go’n',
(Oh, jambalai…)”

Then we’re thrown back into the chorus one last time, before the song starts its long final coda: “Everyone we meet, they’re jamming in the street, all night long,” sings Richie.  By this point the song is soaring, symphonic, ecstatic.  Inside the music, the denizens of its exotic pop ultraworld are intuitively connected in a community of rythmn, the very streets conga eels of twitching funk.

All Night Long imports the spirit of traditional black communal celebration into a shiny global pop product and, in the best Motown tradition, does so with all the slickly engineered proficiency of a Chevrolet coming off a GM production line.  This is what helped make the record an international hit, as resonant in Soweto as it was in LA.  At the same time, dressed in its period aspirational glamour, it brilliantly fulfils one of pop’s core functions, providing a paen to the seemingly inexhaustible mysteries and excitements of the adult world as seen through the prism of adolescence.

All Night Long played a key role in the mammoth success of the smash album Can’t Slow Down, sharing groove space with Hello, a track whose video memorably cast Richie as a jheri-curled tele-stalker pestering a blind college girl. It is a matter of some regret that Lionel Richie would never recapture the glories of All Night Long, prefering instead to concentrate on cementing his growing reputation as the black Barry Manilow.

But for now, Lionel is beckoning again from his impossible island, a kind of funk Prospero, inviting us to join the party one more time. Waves of synth-wash are lapping the shore and the sky is as pink as your drink. Close your eyes and listen to the man.

REVIEW: The Clean – ‘Mister Pop’ (Merge) Release date: 8/09/2009

Posted in Music, Pop/Rock on August 4, 2009 by culturecrammer

 Kiwi punk legends return with a laid-back pop record that isn’t afraid to experiment

61BDFF5W3yL__SS500_Back in the ‘80s and early ’90s, when the hermetically sealed worlds of indie subculture and mainstream chart music almost never met, the New Zealand music scene represented a kind of parallel pop universe.  This was a land where the brushtailed possum roamed, mountaintops glistened and idiosyncratic indie bands like The Chills and Straightjacket Fits penetrated the Top 20.

The Clean, formed in 1978 by David Kilgour and his brother Hamish, were perhaps the band most instrumental in kickstarting this scene.  It was one of their fans that founded the now legendary Flying Nun Records, and it was the unexpected success of their debut hit single “Tally Ho!” that helped turn the nascent label into a viable propsition.

Influenced by the Velvet Underground and New York punk, The Clean tempered their terse, stripped down metallic guitar sound with a quirky pop sensibility that would later inspire bands like Pavement. Their first album since 2001’s Getaway, Mister Pop marks a much-anticipated reunion, apparently recorded in the basement of a church in their hometown of Dunedin.

The result is a mixture of wide-eyed pastoral pop and playful experimentation. Instrumental opener “Loog” sets the tone; a beguiling slice of organ-led ’60s psych-pop that caresses its airy, swirling soundscape with coo-ing female backing vocals. Tongues are pushed firmly into cheeks for the jaunty, Byrdsian pastiche of “Are You Really On Drugs”, while “In the Dreamlife You Need a Rubber Soul” is a breezy reflection on the vacuities of nine-to-five existence, complete with swooning slide guitar.

But it’s with “Asleep in the Tunnel” and “Back in the Day” that the magic starts. Here we’re in Go Betweens territory, with songs that seem to speak to you in confidence, carrying that particularly comforting quality seemingly unique to Antipodean bands.  The effect on the listener is like being re-united with a long lost, favourite shirt.

“The forecast is for snow / You might not make it home”, sings Kilgour on “Asleep”, cocooning us inside its warm, briskly strummed acoustic. “Back in the Day”, with its spangly guitar and twanging, resonant bassline, could almost be vintage Lloyd Cole. We even get a spoken outro: “Out here in the ice fields it seems like / Extreme is the new extreme”, Kilgour observes as the track winds down like a watch:  “I’m not here for a long time / I’m just here for a good time…”  By contrast, “Moon Jumper” is a mesmerising five-minute instrumental drone that borrows heavily from the Velvets and Faust, its shifting textures and percussion brilliantly sustained.

 With “Factory Man”, an insipid ditty that could have been penned by Ray Davies on an off day, the record once again strays into pastiche, but the next two tracks are highlights. The instrumental “Simple Fix” is a delightful smorgasboard of acoustic guitar, piano, whistles, glockenspiels and baby noises, all of which float along on a panoply of percussion instruments from the back of the music school storeroom. This gem of skittering, improvisational loveliness sounds as if it should be soundtracking The Royal Tenenbaums.

Then we hit the home straight with the groove-locked roadrunner rythmns of “Tensile”, a kind of Kiwi ode to the Autobahn complete with pitch-bending keyboards and deadpan, vocodered vocal.

“The town looks best at night/ As we drive by”, the band rasp metallically in their best Kraftwerk voices, while underneath the thrumming, driving bassline, gently fuzzed guitars add to the nocturnal road movie feel.  The album’s brief outro “All Those Notes” rounds things off with a wistful, reconciled air:  “When the sun comes up we’ll be older”, Kilgour reflects ruefully as the music ebbs away.

The Clean are growing older with grace and humor on this humane, smart, and unpretentious record. It’s a patchy affair, and at times its throwaway insouciance can leave you longing for something as intense and incisive as early classics like “Point That Thing Somewhere Else”. Yet at their most inspired The Clean have lost none of their ability to leave you with a life-affirming glow. Mister Pop isn’t going to set anyone’s world alight, but it might make yours a fractionally nicer place to be.

‘Google Earth’ by Paul Farley

Posted in Poetry on August 2, 2009 by culturecrammer

as published in the Summer edition of Poetry London:

 

Now I’m a hand setting the globe to spin,
finding a country, starting to zoom in
now I’m an eye. Now I’m a meteorite.
 
The scars of business corridors, the white
clay works, national parkland, estuaries.
A refinery built from Camemberts and Bries!
 
Now I’m a hand again, steadying my fall,
steering by starlight on the ground, black holes
of reservoirs, flight paths of major roads.
 
Now I’m an eye and there are never clouds
because the west wind of the Internet
blows silently down lost bus routes, birth streets,
 
the school roof still in bad need of repair,
the swing park all deserted at this hour,
which is no-hour. Now I’m the midnight sun
 
lighting the places where we’ve been and gone.
The ground comes up. A field sharpens to grain.
The trees screw into leaf. Now I’m a drop of rain.
 
Now I’m a balloon by Odilon Redon.
And now my chute snags up on power-lines.
If we looked outside, eyeballs might block the sun.
 
Even above the lake isles of Lough Gill,
Adlestrop’s dismantled barrow, a hill
on the road north of Poughkeepsie, there are eyes
 
now all the world’s a drop zone of the mind.

 

Paul Farley is one of the finest poets now writing in English.  Better still, he is a huge fan of The Fall.  Find out more about him here.

PaulFarley2